Minolta MC Rokkor NL 21mm 1:2.8 vs MD 20mm 1:2.8 – comparison

Published by Tony on

Minolta SR ultra-wide lenses comparison:

  • Minolta MC W.Rokkor NL 21mm 1:2.8 (Hills&Valleys/Knurled, MCII)
  • Minolta MD 20mm 1:2.8 (New-MD, MDIII)

One of the most interesting battles – the Legend vs. the Younger. Welcome to the ring

Copy #1 – MCII 21/2.8
Copy #2 – MDIII 20/2.8
Serial: 1502057 8003731
Optical Condition: Mint Mint
Mechanical Condition: Near Mint Near Mint
Cosmetic Condition: Near Mint Near Mint

This comparison is correct only for conditions and equipment used for tests. Test results can differ if any element is changed

Tested lenses reviews


Minolta SR 50mm Macro lenses comparison – sharpness/resolution

Long-distance test description

  • Camera Sony A7II (24mpx, full frame) – RAW (ARW), tripod, A-mode, ISO 100, WB fixed, SteadyShot OFF, manual focus correction for every shot
  • Targets (buildings) – fixed by gravity power on the distances in more than 200 meters
  • ARW post-processing – Capture One, default settings, 100% crops 300×200 px

Scene preview

Test results

Minolta SR ultra-wide lenses comparison – final conclusion:

I love such battles – where every of fighters don’t give up. Here you can see enough unusual case:

  • Center – both are similar
  • Middle – Rokkor 21mm is better
  • Corner – New-MD 20mm is better

(I judge in average over the entire range of diaphragms, from F2.8 to F11)

It seems to me that both lenses are winners. But I realize that fans of Rokkors will find advantages of MCII 21/2.8 and fans of New-MD will find advantages of 20/2.8. To avoid subjectivity I recommend both lenses. Enjoy!


0 Comments

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: