Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm 1:3.5 vs Minolta MD 135mm 1:3.5 – comparison

Published by Tony on

Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm 1:3.5 vs Minolta MD 135mm 1:3.5 – comparison

Older DDR’s (German Democratic Republic/East Germany) vs Japanese latest – 135mm slow manual primes fighting.

Carl Zeiss Jena Minolta MD
Serial: 9389189 Copy #2
Optical Condition: Like new Like new

This comparison is correct only for conditions and equipment used for tests. Test results can differ if any element is changed.

Tested lenses reviews

 

Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm 1:3.5 vs Minolta MD 135mm 1:3.5 – comparison – sharpness/resolution

Long-distance test description

  • Camera Sony A7II (24mpx, full frame) – RAW (ARW), tripod, A-mode, ISO 100, WB fixed, SteadyShot OFF, manual focus correction for every shot
  • Targets (buildings) – fixed by gravity power on the distances in more than 200 meters
  • ARW post-processing – Capture One, default settings, 100% crops 300×200 px

Scene preview

Test results

Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm 1:3.5 vs Minolta MD 135mm 1:3.5 – far

Short-distance test description

  • Target: 10-15 cm picture, printed on glossy photo paper
  • Distance: 1.7m
  • Camera: Sony A7II (24mpx, full-frame, tripod, remote control). M-mode, ISO fixed, WB fixed, SteadyShot – OFF.
  • The test was repeated for every F-stop on every focus position with manual focus adjustment for each shot. That is to avoid the effect of field curvature.
  • RAW processing: Capture One, default settings. All quality settings – 100%. Crops – 300×200 px

Original target image (printed in horizontal orientation on 10cm X 15cm glossy photo paper)

Scene preview

Test results

Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm 1:3.5 vs Minolta MD 135mm 1:3.5 – close

Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm 1:3.5 vs Minolta MD 135mm 1:3.5 – comparison – final conclusion

Definitely Jena won. At both distances, Minolta is clearly inferior in sharpness to the German lens in the center. At apertures from 5.6 there is no longer a difference, but the victory is unequivocal – the open aperture of Carl Zeiss looks better.
A bit of my opinion: very often messages pop up on the network that the Minolta 135 / 3.5 is supposedly a very sharp lens. But I have two copies of this lens (8077396, 8075287) and they show the same results. It seems to me that the statement that the Minolta 135 / 3.5 is very sharp is quite true, but at the same time its sharpness is inferior to any other 135 Minolta lens, and this particular Carl Zeiss.